We’re watching the rewriting of history…
In George Orwells’ 1984, The Ministry of Truth is involved with news media, entertainment, the fine arts and educational books.
Its purpose is to rewrite history to change the facts to fit Party doctrine for propaganda effect.
The main actor playing a dissident was previously honored as a hero. He selects a previously deceased person to be recorded as the recipient of the award and blots out the face of the dissident from he prior news account of the award.
Trending:“Who’s Behind These Talking Points?” Peter Doocy Asks DEI Hire KJP
Fast forward to 2024, the Biden administration is coordinating with media outlets to purge or re-write accurate events determined to reveal the truth of Kamala Harris.
Webpage Rating Kamala Harris ‘Most Liberal’ Senator in 2019 Mysteriously Disappears
A webpage that labeled Vice President Kamala Harris as the “most liberal” senator in 2019 has mysteriously vanished from the internet, raising questions about transparency and accountability.
The page, hosted by GovTrack.us, had documented Harris’s voting record, aligning her with the most progressive policies and stances during her tenure in the Senate.
The sudden disappearance of this information has sparked debate and speculation about potential motives behind its removal.
GovTrack.us, a nonpartisan website that tracks the voting records and activities of U.S. Congress members, had ranked Harris as the most liberal senator based on her voting patterns in 2019. The site’s scoring system, which evaluates senators on a spectrum from liberal to conservative, placed Harris at the extreme end of the liberal scale.
However, visitors to the site recently discovered that the page detailing this ranking had been removed without explanation.
Transparency Concerns
Critics argue that the removal of this webpage undermines transparency and raises concerns about the manipulation of information. Such an action, they contend, prevents the public from accessing complete historical records of elected officials’ performances and ideologies, which is essential for informed voting and civic engagement.
From Fox News:
The self-described “government transparency website” scored Harris as the “most liberal compared to all senators” in 2019, outranking Sens. Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren at the time.
But the web page with the ranking, which was widely covered in news reports during the 2020 election, was recently deactivated. The link now displays a “Page Not Found” message. The Internet Archive shows the page was deleted sometime between July 10 and July 23, with some on X claiming the page was still up on July 22.
President Biden announced his decision to suspend his campaign and endorse Kamala Harris as the Democratic nominee on July 21. Harris announced in the early hours of July 23 that she had secured enough delegates to lock up the nomination at the DNC next month.
When reached by Fox News Digital, GovTrack founder Joshua Tauberer said the page was removed because the company adopted a policy “several years ago” to end its single-year ratings of lawmakers to only do ratings based on Congressional sessions, which are two years.
This event has reignited discussions about bias in media and online platforms, with some suggesting that the removal could be an attempt to rebrand Harris as more centrist ahead of future political endeavors.
As noted by Sean Hannity’s website, “The page, which highlighted Harris’s far-left voting record, has vanished as the Vice President seeks to present herself in a more moderate light.”
Political Rebranding?
The timing of the webpage’s disappearance coincides with efforts by the Biden administration to appeal to a broader base of voters. By potentially downplaying Harris’s liberal voting record, it may be an attempt to align her with more centrist policies that could attract moderate and independent voters. This strategic move, if true, underscores the importance of image management in modern politics.
The sudden removal of the webpage has prompted questions about the integrity of GovTrack.us, a platform previously regarded as a reliable source of legislative data. While the site has not provided an official explanation for the removal, the implications are significant. The action has been viewed by many as an attempt to sanitize the political record of a high-profile public figure.
Conservative Perspective
The disappearance of the webpage is seen as an attempt to obscure the truth.
The conservative news outlet Off the Press commented, “Burying the truth about Kamala Harris’s extreme liberal record only serves to mislead the public.” Such sentiment reflects broader concerns about the selective presentation of information that could influence public opinion and voting behavior.
Moreover, the incident highlights a broader trend of perceived censorship and information control by left-leaning entities. Conservatives argue that this is part of a larger effort to reshape narratives and protect certain political figures from scrutiny.
The removal of the webpage is thus framed as part of a deliberate strategy to shield Harris from criticism and to bolster her image ahead of potential future elections.
The Role of Online Platforms
The incident also brings to light the critical role that online platforms play in shaping public perception. GovTrack.us’s action raises important questions about who controls the flow of information and how this control can impact democratic processes. As digital platforms become increasingly influential in political discourse, ensuring their accountability and transparency becomes paramount.
In the absence of a clear explanation from GovTrack.us, the public is left to speculate about the reasons behind the webpage’s disappearance. Whether it was an innocent oversight, a technical glitch, or a calculated political maneuver, the lack of transparency erodes trust in institutions that provide critical information about public officials.
Conclusion
The mysterious disappearance of the webpage rating Kamala Harris as the most liberal senator in 2019 underscores the importance of transparency and accountability in the digital age.
As the public relies more heavily on online sources for information about their elected representatives, the integrity of these platforms is crucial. The incident raises serious questions about information control and the potential for bias in presenting political records, highlighting the need for vigilance in protecting the integrity of public discourse.
