Orwellian: Media Try to Purge the Record that Kamala Harris Is Joe Biden’s Border Czar
In an unprecedented and Orwellian attempt to rewrite history, major media outlets are now scrambling to erase Vice President Kamala Harris’s role as President Joe Biden’s designated border czar from public memory.
Trending: Steve Bannon’s Supreme Court Appeal Gains Republican Support
Harris, who was tasked with addressing the southern border crisis in March 2021, is now seeing her association with the border issue increasingly omitted from media reports. This deliberate omission raises significant questions about the integrity and agenda of the mainstream media.
Upon assuming office, President Biden appointed Kamala Harris to oversee the administration’s response to the influx of migrants at the southern border.
As Biden declared, Harris was to lead efforts in “stemming the migration to our southern border” and address the “root causes of migration” from Central America. Despite these clear directives, recent media coverage appears to have selectively forgotten this crucial aspect of her portfolio.
A striking example of this selective amnesia can be observed in the stark contrast between earlier and current media narratives. In 2021, Harris’s role was widely acknowledged, with outlets like CNN, The New York Times, and others frequently highlighting her responsibility. However, recent reports have conspicuously downplayed or entirely omitted her involvement. This deliberate shift in coverage has not gone unnoticed.
According to a NewsBusters analysis, the media’s portrayal of Harris’s role has shifted dramatically. The study revealed a significant decrease in mentions of Harris in connection to the border crisis. Nicholas Fondacaro of NewsBusters noted, “The liberal media have seemingly forgotten that Kamala Harris was given the title of ‘border czar’ by President Biden.” Fondacaro’s analysis underscores the media’s concerted effort to erase Harris’s border czar designation from public discourse .
Furthermore, The Gateway Pundit presented a compelling before-and-after comparison of media coverage. The analysis showcased how outlets like CNN and MSNBC initially highlighted Harris’s border responsibilities but have since pivoted to focus on other aspects of her vice-presidential duties.
The Gateway Pundit observed, “The media have done a complete about-face, conveniently ignoring her failure to manage the border crisis effectively .
The same “journalist,” @StefWKight, also wrote an article with this headline in March of 2021.
Why does the media constantly lie and think you’ll believe them? https://t.co/uEniqnObXH pic.twitter.com/PYVjJwO0xJ
— Marjorie Taylor Greene 🇺🇸 (@mtgreenee) July 24, 2024
This erasure coincides with the administration’s ongoing struggles at the border. The Biden administration has faced intense criticism over its handling of the border crisis, with record numbers of illegal crossings and reports of inhumane conditions at detention facilities. Critics argue that this media shift is an attempt to shield Harris from accountability and protect her political future.
Such actions by the media echo the warnings of George Orwell’s dystopian classic, 1984, where history is constantly rewritten to suit the ruling party’s narrative. The media’s selective memory regarding Harris’s border czar role can be seen as an attempt to manipulate public perception and obscure her association with the administration’s failures at the border.
This development also highlights a broader issue within the media landscape. The mainstream media’s apparent willingness to revise the narrative to align with political agendas undermines their role as impartial purveyors of truth. By selectively omitting facts, the media not only distorts public understanding but also erodes trust in journalism as a whole.
From a conservative standpoint, this Orwellian maneuver by the media is deeply troubling. It exemplifies the biased nature of mainstream journalism, where inconvenient truths are often buried to favor a particular political narrative. The conservative critique emphasizes the importance of holding public officials accountable, regardless of their political affiliation. In this case, Kamala Harris’s failure to address the border crisis effectively should be scrutinized and reported on honestly.
Moreover, this media revisionism poses significant implications for the democratic process. An informed electorate is essential for the functioning of a healthy democracy. When the media selectively edits the historical record, it deprives citizens of the information necessary to make informed decisions. This manipulation of facts not only distorts public perception but also threatens the very foundation of democratic governance.
In light of these concerns, it is imperative for independent and conservative media outlets to continue highlighting Harris’s role as border czar and scrutinizing the administration’s handling of the border crisis. By doing so, they can provide a counterbalance to the mainstream narrative and ensure that the public remains informed.
In conclusion, the media’s attempt to purge Kamala Harris’s record as Joe Biden’s border czar represents a disturbing trend in contemporary journalism. This Orwellian rewriting of history underscores the need for a vigilant and independent press that prioritizes truth over political expediency. As the border crisis continues to unfold, it is essential that all aspects of the administration’s response, including Harris’s role, are reported accurately and transparently.