AZ Rep Biggs Seeks to Remove Rogue Federal Judge Without Impeachment

In a powerful move to uphold the rule of law and defend the constitutional authority of the executive branch, Rep. Andy Biggs (R-AZ) has introduced a resolution to remove U.S. District Judge James Boasberg from his position. Biggs, an unwavering supporter of President Trump’s America First agenda, is calling out Boasberg’s blatant judicial overreach and abuse of power in blocking Trump’s effort to deport alleged Venezuelan gang members using the Alien Enemies Act of 1798.

At the heart of Biggs’ resolution is the Constitution’s “good behavior” requirement for federal judges. While the left wants to shield activist judges from accountability, Biggs is making it clear that federal judges do not hold lifetime appointments without consequences. As he explained to Just the News, judges are permitted to serve only as long as they maintain good behavior. When they cross the line and interfere with executive authority or act on political motives, Congress has not just the right but the duty to act.

Biggs rightly argues that Judge Boasberg’s decision to halt deportations directly undermined President Trump’s constitutional powers to conduct foreign policy and protect national security. By ordering planes carrying alleged gang members back to the United States, Boasberg interfered with the executive branch’s use of the Alien Enemies Act, a law specifically designed to protect American citizens from foreign threats.

President Trump has long warned that leftist judges are weaponizing the court system to block his America First policies. This incident is just another clear example of how activist judges are undermining the president’s ability to secure the border and enforce immigration laws. The Alien Enemies Act of 1798 was put in place precisely to allow the president to protect the country from foreign threats. Yet, Judge Boasberg took it upon himself to override the president’s authority, blatantly disregarding the Constitution and national security.

Biggs isn’t just calling for Boasberg’s removal as a symbolic gesture; he’s taking a stand to protect the balance of power that our Founding Fathers established. The Good Behavior Clause of Article III, Section 1 of the Constitution provides the legal basis for Congress to act when judges abandon their impartial role and insert political biases into their rulings.

By blocking President Trump’s use of the Alien Enemies Act, Boasberg not only compromised America’s security but also set a dangerous precedent where judges can dictate foreign policy. This overreach from the bench is an affront to the separation of powers and threatens to turn judges into political activists rather than impartial interpreters of the law.

Biggs is not alone in recognizing the urgent need to rein in judicial overreach. Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH), a staunch ally of President Trump, has been vocal about limiting the power of activist judges by introducing measures to restrict nationwide injunctions. These injunctions have been weaponized by left-leaning judges to obstruct conservative policies, whether it’s securing the border, protecting the Second Amendment, or defending religious freedoms.

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA) has introduced legislation to prevent judges from issuing nationwide orders that exceed their jurisdiction. This effort, like Biggs’ resolution, is aimed at curbing judicial activism and restoring constitutional balance.

What makes Biggs’ approach particularly smart is his understanding that impeachment is not the only way to hold judges accountable. Instead of going through the cumbersome process that requires a supermajority in the Senate, Biggs is pursuing a strategy grounded in Article III, Section 1, which allows for removal based on violations of “good behavior.” This innovative interpretation could pave the way for a more efficient process to remove rogue judges who abuse their authority.

Biggs has made it clear that holding judges accountable is essential to preserving the rule of law. Trump supporters across the nation are rallying behind Biggs, praising him for taking a stand against judicial tyranny and fighting to protect the president’s constitutional powers. In contrast to the weak and ineffective leadership of Democrats, Biggs is showing that conservatives are not afraid to challenge the establishment and demand accountability.

President Trump’s bold stance on immigration and national security has always been rooted in putting Americans first. Yet, the radical left and their allies in the judiciary continue to block these efforts in favor of political correctness and open borders. Biggs’ resolution is a necessary reminder that no judge is above the law, and politically motivated rulings must not be tolerated.

America cannot afford to let activist judges hijack the country’s immigration policies. As President Trump has repeatedly stated, “We are either a nation of laws or a nation of chaos.” It’s time to take back control from those who want to erode our sovereignty and put foreign interests ahead of American citizens.

The battle to hold Judge Boasberg accountable is about more than just one ruling; it’s about standing up against the weaponization of the judiciary. It’s about ensuring that judges cannot hijack executive powers and undermine the will of the people. Conservatives across the country must continue to support courageous leaders like Andy Biggs who refuse to back down from defending American sovereignty and upholding the Constitution.

As the fight for judicial accountability rages on, Biggs’ resolution stands as a bold challenge to unchecked judicial power. Republicans must rally behind this effort to send a clear message that rogue judges will not be tolerated and that President Trump’s mission to put America first will not be derailed by politically motivated decisions.

This effort by Rep. Andy Biggs is just the beginning. Conservatives across the nation are standing firm, reminding the judiciary that they answer to the Constitution — not the radical left’s agenda. The fight for America’s future demands nothing less.