Tulsi Gabbard, a former Democrat and one-time presidential candidate, has endorsed former President Donald Trump for the 2024 presidential election.
While speaking at the National Guard Association of the United States conference on Monday, Trump introduced Gabbard to speak.
Gabbard’s endorsement comes days after Robert F. Kennedy Jr. suspended his presidential campaign and endorsed Trump.
Gabbard, known for her independent and often controversial political positions, announced her support for Trump during a recent appearance, emphasizing his record of avoiding new military conflicts during his tenure. This endorsement is particularly notable given Gabbard’s previous affiliation with the Democratic Party and her reputation as a critic of the establishment.
Gabbard’s endorsement is rooted in her long-standing opposition to what she describes as the “military-industrial complex” that dominates U.S. foreign policy. She highlighted Trump’s restraint in not initiating new wars, a position she has consistently advocated for throughout her political career. “He did not start new wars,” Gabbard stated, underscoring one of the key reasons for her support .
This endorsement marks a significant shift in the political landscape, as Gabbard, once a rising star within the Democratic Party, has increasingly aligned herself with conservative viewpoints. Her support for Trump is likely to resonate with voters who prioritize non-interventionist foreign policies and are wary of the U.S. engaging in further military conflicts abroad.
“I mean what I say when I share with you that I know that President Trump understands the grave responsibility that a President and Commander-in-Chief bears for every single one of our lives,” Gabbard added.
“Whether you’re a soldier, you’re an Airmen, a Marine, sailor, or a Coastie, he keeps us in his heart in the decisions that he makes. We saw this through his first term in the presidency, when he not only didn’t start any new wars, he took action to de-escalate and prevent wars.”
“He exercised the courage that we expect from our Commander-in-Chief in exhausting all measures of diplomacy, having the courage to meet with adversaries, dictators, allies, and partners alike in the pursuit of peace, seeing war as a last resort,” Gabbard added. “The truth is as we head towards our decision as a country in November, the same can not be said about Kamala Harris.”
“In fact, the opposite is true, and we’re living through this reality today as this administration has us facing multiple wars on multiple fronts in regions around the world, and closer to the brink of nuclear war than we ever have been before. This is one of the main reasons why I am committed to doing all that I can to send President Trump back to the White House where he can once again serve us as our Commander-in-Chief.”
Gabbard’s endorsement also reflects a broader trend of disillusionment with the Democratic Party among certain segments of the electorate. She has been vocal about her dissatisfaction with the party’s direction, particularly regarding its handling of foreign policy. Gabbard’s stance against U.S. involvement in foreign wars has often put her at odds with mainstream Democrats, and her endorsement of Trump is seen as a culmination of her growing ideological distance from the party.
Trump, who has consistently criticized U.S. involvement in “endless wars,” has welcomed Gabbard’s endorsement. During his presidency, Trump sought to reduce the U.S. military footprint in conflict zones like Afghanistan and Syria, a policy that aligns with Gabbard’s anti-interventionist stance. Trump’s approach to foreign policy, often characterized as “America First,” has garnered support from those who believe that U.S. resources should be focused on domestic issues rather than foreign entanglements.
Gabbard’s endorsement is expected to have an impact on the 2024 presidential race, particularly among voters who prioritize foreign policy issues. Her support may also influence other independent-minded voters who are disillusioned with the current direction of the Democratic Party. While Gabbard’s endorsement of Trump may come as a surprise to some, it is consistent with her track record of challenging the status quo and advocating for a more restrained U.S. foreign policy.
This development also highlights the ongoing realignment within American politics, where traditional party loyalties are increasingly being questioned. Gabbard’s endorsement of Trump, a former Republican president, underscores the fluidity of political affiliations in the current climate. Her decision to back Trump reflects a growing dissatisfaction with the establishment, as more voters seek alternatives to the mainstream positions of both major parties.
Critics of Gabbard’s endorsement have argued that her support for Trump is inconsistent with her past positions on issues such as civil liberties and government transparency. However, Gabbard has defended her decision, asserting that Trump’s foreign policy record aligns with her core principles. “He did not start new wars,” Gabbard reiterated, emphasizing the importance of this issue in her endorsement .
In a political environment marked by increasing polarization, Gabbard’s endorsement of Trump is likely to be both celebrated and criticized. Her support for a former Republican president highlights the complex and often unpredictable nature of modern American politics. As the 2024 election approaches, Gabbard’s endorsement of Trump will undoubtedly be a topic of discussion, particularly among voters who are dissatisfied with the current state of U.S. foreign policy.
Gabbard’s endorsement also raises questions about the future of the Democratic Party, as more figures who once identified with the party’s values continue to break away. Her decision to support Trump suggests a broader trend of disillusionment with the party’s leadership and direction. Whether this will lead to a significant shift in the political landscape remains to be seen, but Gabbard’s endorsement is a clear indication that the status quo is being challenged.
if i was trump, i would not trust any demorar. remember the back stabbing pence. these people are crossing over so that they can screw trump bigly when he gets in and deny him an honest shot at d.c. again. they are just brown nosing so they can gather more phony things against him. heed my words, they are are out for no good.