House Report Reveals ‘Two-Tiered Government’ After Two-Year Investigation

The House Select Committee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government has released a stunning 17,000-page report after a two-year investigation into alleged abuses by federal law enforcement and intelligence agencies. The findings paint a grim picture of a “two-tiered system of government” that allegedly favors the politically connected elite while targeting ordinary Americans.

The report accuses federal agencies of censorship, whistleblower retaliation, and overt political bias. These practices, the committee argues, have systematically undermined civil liberties, creating a disturbing imbalance in how justice and governance are applied across the nation.

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan (R-OH) has led the charge on this investigation. Speaking to Fox News Digital, Jordan stated, “The Weaponization Committee conducted rigorous oversight of the Biden-Harris administration’s weaponized government and uncovered numerous examples of federal government abuses.”

One of the most shocking revelations involves Big Tech’s alleged collaboration with federal agencies to suppress information. Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg admitted that Facebook’s content moderation decisions were influenced by federal officials, a phenomenon the report dubs the “censorship-industrial complex.” According to the committee, these actions violated Americans’ First Amendment rights and set a dangerous precedent for government overreach.

The report also revisits the Hunter Biden laptop controversy during the 2020 presidential election. It alleges that the Biden campaign worked with 51 former intelligence officials to discredit the laptop’s content as “disinformation.” The committee argues this deliberate misinformation campaign misled the public and influenced the election outcome.

“These findings confirm a troubling pattern of federal interference in critical democratic processes,” the report states.

🚨 @Weaponization releases 17,000-page staff report detailing the Select Subcommittee’s findings about the Biden-Harris Administration’s weaponized federal government.

Through its oversight and investigations, the Select Subcommittee found numerous instances of the federal…

— House Judiciary GOP 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 (@JudiciaryGOP) December 20, 2024

The investigation owes much of its findings to whistleblowers who risked their careers to expose alleged misconduct within federal agencies. These individuals provided firsthand accounts of incidents ranging from Internal Revenue Service (IRS) targeting of conservative groups to Department of Justice (DOJ) actions that appeared politically motivated.

Chairman Jordan praised their courage, saying, “Numerous brave individuals stepped up to expose these injustices. Their testimony has been vital in uncovering the truth and pushing for necessary reforms.”

The committee’s work extends beyond merely documenting abuses. It has proposed legislative and policy reforms aimed at preventing future overreach. These recommendations include:

• Stricter oversight of federal agencies.
• Enhanced protections for whistleblowers.
• Measures to curtail undue influence by private entities like Big Tech.

Jordan emphasized that these reforms are crucial for restoring public trust in government institutions and safeguarding Americans’ rights.

The report highlights the dangerous implications of what it describes as a “two-tiered system of government.” This system, the committee claims, allows the politically connected to operate with impunity while ordinary citizens face disproportionate scrutiny and penalties.

Critics argue that this imbalance threatens the democratic principles of fairness and equality under the law. “When justice is applied unequally, trust in government erodes,” the report warns.

While the findings have been celebrated by conservatives as a vindication of long-held concerns, they have also sparked significant backlash. Many Democrats and political commentators have dismissed the report as a partisan effort, arguing that it lacks sufficient evidence to support its sweeping conclusions.

Critics contend that the investigation was politically motivated, aimed more at discrediting the Biden administration than addressing genuine systemic issues.

Despite the controversy, the report has reignited debates about the role of government and the balance of power between federal institutions and the public. For Chairman Jordan and his allies, the findings are not merely the conclusion of a two-year investigation but the foundation for a broader push toward accountability and reform.

“Through our oversight, we protected the First Amendment by investigating the censorship-industrial complex, stopped the targeting of Americans by the IRS and DOJ, and created serious legislative and policy changes that will benefit all Americans,” Jordan said.

As the report continues to circulate, its long-term impact on policy and public opinion remains uncertain. However, it is clear that the committee’s findings have struck a chord with many Americans, reigniting conversations about fairness, justice, and the proper role of government in a free society.

Whether these revelations lead to meaningful change or become another flashpoint in the nation’s political divide will depend on how lawmakers and citizens alike respond to the committee’s call for reform.