Jack Smith Resigns as Special Counsel Before Trump’s Return

Jack Smith, the special counsel leading investigations into former President Donald Trump’s efforts to challenge the 2020 election, has resigned from his position. This development comes as President-elect Trump prepares to take office once again, prompting speculation about Smith’s decision to step down.

Critics of the investigations, including prominent conservative commentator Mark Levin, see Smith’s resignation as an admission of failure in a case they argue should never have been pursued.

Smith’s high-profile cases against Trump, which focused on allegations of election interference and related actions, have faced mounting scrutiny. Levin, host of LevinTV, contends that Smith’s legal approach was flawed from the beginning.

Eric Thompson Show

“You know why he’s stepping down? It’s simple,” Levin said. “He’s an unconstitutional prosecutor. Donald Trump’s going to fire his ass. All the cases collapse, based on Department of Justice memos.”

Levin referenced a recent Florida court ruling that dismissed one of the charges against Trump, a move he said reflects the overall weakness of Smith’s cases.

“These cases should never have been brought,” Levin argued. “They were rushed, they violated Department of Justice rules, and they were designed to imprison Trump before the election.”

Levin has called for an investigation into those responsible for greenlighting what he views as politically motivated prosecutions. He urged the incoming administration to take action against officials involved in pursuing the charges.

“It’s also my position that the new attorney general needs to dig into this and find out who exactly was responsible for it,” Levin said. “They did everything possible to affect the election and to destroy Donald Trump’s life.”

Smith’s investigations, Levin and other critics claim, were part of a broader campaign to damage Trump politically and legally, undermining his ability to campaign effectively during the 2024 election cycle.

One of the central controversies surrounding Smith’s investigations is the question of whether challenging election results constitutes a criminal act. Levin argues that efforts to contest an election are both legal and common in U.S. history.

“A candidate has every right to try and challenge an election, which means to overturn it,” Levin said. “That’s exactly what’s going on in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania today at the behest of Chuck Schumer with their slip-and-fall lawyer Mark Elias.”

Levin pointed to historical examples of election challenges, such as Al Gore’s efforts during the 2000 presidential election and legal disputes in Minnesota that resulted in Al Franken’s Senate victory over Norm Coleman.

“There’s simply nothing criminal about challenging it, about looking for more votes, about encouraging a state legislature to act, about encouraging a board of elections to act,” Levin explained. “This is the first time it’s been criminalized.”

Levin alleges that the urgency to prosecute Trump before the 2024 election was part of a deliberate strategy to hinder his political comeback. He criticized the Department of Justice for what he described as partisan behavior.

“They were in a rush to get these cases prosecuted. To get him in prison before the election, which also violated numerous Department of Justice rules,” Levin said.

The perceived bias in the investigations has fueled calls for reforms to ensure fairness in the justice system, especially when it comes to high-profile political figures.

Smith’s resignation removes one of Trump’s most prominent legal adversaries, but the fallout from the investigations is far from over. Trump has repeatedly denied wrongdoing and framed the cases against him as part of a politically motivated “witch hunt.”

With Trump returning to the White House, his administration is expected to take a hard look at the Justice Department’s handling of these cases. Levin and other conservatives are pushing for accountability and reforms to prevent what they see as abuses of power in the future.

Smith’s departure marks a turning point in the legal battles surrounding Trump. While his supporters see it as vindication, his critics argue that the investigations were justified given the unprecedented events following the 2020 election.

As the dust settles, the focus will shift to the broader implications of Smith’s resignation and what it means for the legal and political landscape moving forward. Trump’s return to power is set to reignite debates over election integrity, the role of the Justice Department, and the limits of legal accountability for political leaders.

For now, Smith’s resignation raises more questions than it answers, setting the stage for further scrutiny of the cases he leaves behind and the broader dynamics of a deeply polarized political system.