Recently, a chat log from December 2024 surfaced, revealing some quite shocking sentiments among U.S. intelligence officials about Tulsi Gabbard. These officials, from agencies like the National Security Agency and U.S. Space Command, were caught in a web of gossip, labeling Gabbard as a Russian agent and a cult member. They exchanged these opinions with their preferred pronouns in their screen names, painting a picture of a workplace fraught with personal biases.
One employee from the U.S. Space Command boldly claimed, “Gabbard is a Russian agent, [in my opinion].” Another employee from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence chimed in, criticizing Gabbard for being “fervently anti-queer.” The same person accused her of belonging to a cult, specifically mentioning, “2 if you count MAGA.”
These conversations were part of a broader set of discussions that included federal security agents talking about unusual sexual topics. Their chats delved into male sex-change operations, cross-dressing, and other topics that seemed out of place for national security conversations. The fascination with these topics was previously highlighted by Blaze News, causing a stir among conservative commentators.
In another part of the chat, officials revealed a desire to have intersex children as a way to promote transgender ideologies. An NSA official wrote, “An intersex birth would be a great opportunity to raise a kid as [nonbinary] and let them choose later.” This sparked a response from a National Reconnaissance Office employee, who added, “Or not choose at all!”
A CIA official added their two cents, arguing that such discussions show that gender is a socially constructed identity. Meanwhile, an NSA agent noted that the term “hermaphroditism” has become offensive, reflecting the ever-evolving landscape of gender identity discussions. This exchange highlights the increasing prevalence of progressive ideologies within federal agencies.
The chat logs also revealed disparaging remarks about well-known conservative figures. A U.S. Navy employee described Libs of TikTok, a popular online personality, as a “f***ing monster” and expressed embarrassment over their shared Jewish heritage. This kind of rhetoric has become alarmingly common in certain circles, raising questions about bias within government institutions.
Several government employees took aim at political commentator Ben Shapiro, suggesting he should be expelled from Judaism. A Navy official compared Shapiro’s Jewish identity to having a relative who “spouts hate speech.” This kind of divisive talk is becoming more frequent, reflecting a troubling trend within some government circles.
One NSA official even bragged about excommunicating a homophobic uncle, further demonstrating the extent of personal biases influencing professional environments. These kinds of actions and statements raise serious concerns about the impartiality and objectivity of officials tasked with national security.
While these chat logs showcase a shocking level of bias and unprofessionalism, they also shed light on the increasing presence of progressive ideologies within federal agencies. This trend is particularly concerning for those who value traditional American ideals and principles. The conversations reveal a workplace culture that seems more focused on pushing personal agendas than on maintaining national security.
In a world where security and intelligence should be paramount, these discussions are a stark reminder of the challenges facing conservative values. As the political landscape continues to shift, it’s crucial for those in power to remain impartial and focused on their duties. The blending of personal biases with professional responsibilities can have serious implications for the nation’s safety.
The leaked chats have sparked outrage among conservative commentators and have fueled the ongoing debate about bias within government institutions. With these revelations, it’s clear that there is a need for greater accountability and transparency within federal agencies. The American people deserve to know that their safety is not being compromised by personal agendas.
The conversations about Tulsi Gabbard, and the broader discussions within these agencies, raise important questions about the state of national security. As conservative voices continue to push for transparency and accountability, these revelations serve as a wake-up call for those in power. It’s time to refocus on the core responsibilities of these agencies and ensure that they remain committed to protecting the nation.
As the political and social landscape evolves, it’s crucial for federal agencies to stay true to their mission and uphold the values that have made America great. The conversations revealed in these chat logs highlight the need for a renewed commitment to impartiality and professionalism. Only by addressing these issues can we ensure the continued safety and security of the nation.
Tulsi needs to fire them or demote them to the bottom.
No demotion, just fire them and make the reasons public. If they are immigrants ship them out along with Omar.
Line E, no bennies.
Crenshaw should be brought up in front of the ethics committee, reprimanded and fined.