Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations around sensitive areas such as schools have stirred up concerns from immigration advocates. These advocates are worried about the potential “chilling effects” on undocumented parents.
During a segment with CNN’s Kaitlan Collins, former ICE Director Tom Homan addressed these concerns by underscoring the agency’s commitment to enforcing immigration laws and handling threats to public safety and national security.
Give Me Five Podcast
Thomas Homan, who once led U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, recently spoke about border issues at the Arizona Commerce Authority in Phoenix. His remarks come amid a backdrop of discussions about immigration enforcement near schools. During the segment, Collins pointed out the worries immigration advocates have about ICE’s presence in such locations.
“What we had heard from immigration advocates is that this is going to provide a chilling effect to parents in the school drop-off line or something of that matter,” Collins stated. Homan pushed back against this notion, asserting that parents should not fear ICE operations unless there is a direct threat involved. “It shouldn’t be a chilling effect unless their child is a terrorist or a public safety threat. If they are a public safety threat and national security threat, they should be chilled. They should be afraid because we’re looking for them,” Homan remarked.
Collins continued the conversation, touching on the topic of illegal alien parents and the broader implications of ICE enforcement. She added, “Well, if their parent is here and they’re an undocumented immigrant, I think was, was more of the argument that they were making.” Homan responded by reiterating that being in the country illegally is a violation of U.S. law. He stressed that no locations should be considered entirely off-limits for immigration enforcement.
MYPILLOW – MEGA SALE
https://www.mypillow.com/gmf
“They’re not off the table either. And then a country illegally, they got a problem. I mean, it’s not okay. Look, it’s not okay to enter this country illegally. It’s a crime, and that’s why it’s supposed to be. I wouldn’t feel comfortable if I’m in Switzerland illegally,” he explained. Homan made it clear that ICE remains committed to enforcing immigration laws across all locations, especially when addressing threats to public safety or national security.
“So, you know, the schools and the churches and essential location was a policy only for ICE, only for immigration, right? But national security threats and public safety threats have no safe haven in this country, and we’ll go where we gotta go,” Homan emphasized. His comments highlight the agency’s determination to prioritize public safety above all else.
In the ongoing debate over ICE operations near sensitive locations, immigration advocates continue to voice concerns about the impact on communities and families. Meanwhile, Homan and others maintain that no area should serve as a sanctuary for those who threaten national security or public safety.
The conversation on this topic remains heated, with both sides presenting arguments that reflect their perspectives on immigration enforcement. While advocates worry about the effects on undocumented parents, Homan stands firm in his belief that enforcement should not be restricted by location.
The issues at the border and the actions of ICE have long been topics of national discussion. Homan’s stance underscores a focus on the law and the safety of American citizens, values that resonate with many who support strict immigration policies.
The notion that certain areas might be off-limits for enforcement is a contentious one, as Homan’s comments reveal. The former ICE director’s perspective aligns with those who argue for robust immigration control measures.
Some believe that the presence of ICE near schools and other sensitive locations could cause unnecessary fear among communities. Yet, others see it as a necessary step to ensure that laws are upheld and safety is prioritized.
Homan’s words serve as a reminder of the agency’s obligation to enforce immigration laws without compromise. His views are emblematic of a broader political ideology that prioritizes national security and the rule of law.
While the debate continues, it is clear that the conversation around ICE operations is far from over. The differing opinions on this matter reflect the complex nature of immigration policy and its impact on society.
