President-elect Donald Trump has launched a blistering attack on New York Judge Juan Merchan after the judge set a January 10 sentencing date in Trump’s New York “hush money” case. Trump, who has consistently maintained his innocence, has framed the timing as an unprecedented assault on the presidency, warning it could mark “the end of the Presidency as we know it.”
The scheduled sentencing date comes just ten days before Trump is set to return to the White House, igniting a firestorm of debate among legal experts, political analysts, and his loyal supporters.
Top Immunity Support For The Times:
Immune systems can be weakened by poor diet, lack of sleep, and countless other environmental factors.
Our products may help support your body’s natural defenses.
Save 15% W/ Code “SAVE”
Visit: https://GetZStack.Com
Includes FREE SHIPPING in USA
Taking to Truth Social, Trump unleashed a series of posts condemning the decision as a politically motivated attack designed to derail his presidency. “Every legal scholar and pundit… have unequivocally stated that the Manhattan D.A.’s Witch Hunt is a nonexistent case, which is not only barred by the Statute of Limitations but, on the merits, should never have been brought,” Trump wrote.
He accused Judge Merchan of acting as a partisan agent, declaring, “This illegitimate political attack is nothing but a Rigged Charade. Merchan’s actions flagrantly violate the Constitution, exposing him as a radical partisan.”
Adding to his grievances, Trump decried the gag order imposed during the trial, calling it a “despicable First Amendment Violation” aimed at silencing his voice.
In another fiery post, Trump accused Merchan of misconduct and compared him unfavorably to Special Counsel Jack Smith, who had previously prosecuted Trump. “Merchan, who is far worse and even more corrupt than Smith, just cannot let go of this charade,” Trump wrote.
Trump also took aim at the broader legal system, asserting that politically motivated prosecutions must end to protect the presidency. “It is time to end the Lawfare once and for all, so we can come together as one Nation and MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!”
Amid the uproar, Judge Merchan has indicated that he does not intend to impose severe punishment. Legal analysts have noted that Merchan is considering an “unconditional discharge,” which would effectively mean no immediate penalties for Trump’s felony conviction.
In his ruling, Merchan cited concerns about Trump’s immunity from criminal prosecution upon taking office. “The most viable solution appears to be an unconditional discharge,” the judge stated.
The case revolves around allegations that Trump falsified business records in 2016 by paying $130,000 to adult film star Stormy Daniels to prevent her from publicly discussing an alleged sexual encounter in 2006. Trump has vehemently denied the allegations, labeling the case a baseless political attack.
In May, Trump was convicted on 34 counts of falsifying business records, making him the first former president in U.S. history to face criminal charges after leaving office.
Trump’s legal team has fought to have the case dismissed, arguing that the charges are incompatible with his status as president-elect. However, Judge Merchan rejected the motion, ruling that Trump’s upcoming presidency does not shield him from legal accountability.
Trump spokesperson Steven Cheung issued a statement emphasizing the need for the president-elect to transition into office without disruption. “President Trump must be allowed to continue the Presidential Transition process and to execute the vital duties of the presidency, unobstructed by the remains of this or any remnants of the Witch Hunts,” Cheung said.
The January 10 sentencing has reignited fierce debate over the balance between presidential duties and legal accountability. Trump’s supporters argue that the timing of the sentencing is a calculated move to undermine his leadership and tarnish his legacy.
Trump’s claim that the ruling represents “the end of the Presidency as we know it” highlights his broader concerns about setting a precedent for future leaders. His critics, however, contend that no individual—regardless of their office—should be above the law.
As Trump prepares to take the oath of office for a second term, the January 10 sentencing looms as a pivotal moment in his political career. The outcome of the case could shape not only his presidency but also the broader trajectory of American political norms.
Whether Trump’s dire warnings will come to pass or if the sentencing will simply be another chapter in his contentious political journey remains to be seen. One thing is certain: this high-stakes drama will leave an indelible mark on the nation’s history.
