U.S. Aid Funded Legal Help for LGBT Asylum Seekers in UK: Report


During the Biden administration, American taxpayer money was reportedly used to fund diversity and LGBT initiatives in the United Kingdom.

The U.S. State Department is said to have allocated funds for several progressive programs in Britain, the world’s sixth-largest economy. This included $25,000 to support “Rainbow Migration,” a group assisting “LGBTQI+ people” seeking asylum in the UK.

The State Department also reportedly sent $40,000 to the Edinburgh International Book Festival. This funding was intended to facilitate interviews addressing social issues related to gender identity, racial equity, and diversity. Additionally, $35,000 was granted to an Ohio university to create exhibitions in the UK focusing on “LGBTQ+ stories” during the coronavirus pandemic.

In another instance, the Biden administration allegedly provided $14 million to the Tony Blair Institute. This globalist think tank, founded by a former British prime minister, was to conduct aid work in Africa and Lebanon. These revelations have sparked increased scrutiny on American foreign aid spending under the Biden administration.

The Trump administration, along with the Department of Government Efficiency, has been critical of such spending. President Trump recently ordered the closure of USAID, the leading U.S. foreign aid agency. Plans are underway to merge some of its functions with the State Department to streamline operations.

USAID has faced criticism for funding projects perceived as promoting woke ideologies, such as DEI initiatives in Serbian workplaces. However, The Telegraph reported that most programs funded in Britain were through the State Department.

A department spokesman stated that, under Trump’s direction, Secretary of State Marco Rubio has paused all foreign assistance pending review.

The review aims to ensure that foreign aid aligns with U.S. foreign policy under the America First agenda. Reform UK leader Nigel Farage expressed concerns about the Biden administration’s approach. According to Farage, the administration pursued a “leftist, globalist, woke agenda” intended to transform Western society.

Farage also highlighted the potential changes with Trump’s return to the White House. He suggested that U.S. taxpayer money would no longer “poison British society.” Farage characterized the previous U.S. foreign aid as “massive societal and political interference.”

The return to “good, basic, sound principles” is something Farage anticipates under Trump’s leadership. He believes Trump’s administration will halt the influence of woke agendas overseas. This sentiment is shared by many who feel traditional values should guide America’s international engagements.

The controversy over the funding has fueled broader discussions about the role of U.S. foreign aid. Many conservatives argue that aid should prioritize national interests and reflect American values. This perspective aligns with the broader America First policy agenda.

The revelations have underscored the need for transparency in foreign aid spending. Critics argue that U.S. resources should focus on projects that directly benefit American interests and allies. This view contrasts sharply with the progressive policies seen under the Biden administration.

The current political climate suggests a reevaluation of foreign aid priorities. As the U.S. navigates global challenges, aligning aid with core values remains a focal point for policymakers. This approach reflects a desire to ensure taxpayer dollars are spent wisely and effectively.

The ongoing debate about foreign aid highlights differing ideological perspectives. Conservatives emphasize the importance of traditional values and national sovereignty. Meanwhile, progressive policies have faced pushback amid concerns of international overreach and Just plain woke stupidity.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *