House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan is gearing up for a series of hearings to investigate what he sees as judicial overreach. These hearings will focus on decisions by federal judges that have interfered with President Donald Trump’s executive powers. Jordan made this announcement during interviews with Fox News hosts Bill Hemmer and Brian Kilmeade.
The hearings will scrutinize the legal authority of judges issuing nationwide injunctions, with Judge James Boasberg being a focal point. Boasberg’s March 15, 2025, ruling stopped President Trump’s use of the Alien Enemies Act of 1798, which aimed to deport Venezuelan gang members. This decision ordered the cessation of deportation flights and the return of those already in progress.
Jordan believes Boasberg’s ruling is politically motivated, undermining the President’s constitutional authority over immigration and national security. He expressed these concerns on Fox News, emphasizing the broader issue of judicial injunctions. Jordan also highlighted Boasberg’s history on the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISA).
Judge Boasberg previously approved surveillance warrants during the controversial Trump-Russia investigation. One notable case involved FBI attorney Kevin Clinesmith, who altered an email submitted to the FISA court. Clinesmith received a non-prison sentence, which Jordan criticized as too lenient.
Jordan aims to explore the broader issue of judicial authority and any potential political bias. He mentioned legislative responses to these issues, such as a Judiciary Committee bill introduced by Rep. Darrell Issa. This bill would limit district court injunctions to the parties involved and the judge’s jurisdiction.
A similar bill is in the works in the Senate, introduced by Sen. Josh Hawley. Jordan expressed the need for Congress to pass these measures and for President Trump to sign them. He believes such legislation will help restore balance to the judiciary.
Additionally, Jordan suggested financial oversight as another avenue for reform. This could include a rescissions package to withdraw federal funding from agencies engaged in politically driven actions. He argued the funds could be redirected for deficit reduction or military use.
The hearings will align with other Republican efforts in the Senate, potentially involving Sen. Chuck Grassley. Jordan is determined to address what he sees as a pattern of judicial overreach. He aims to ensure the President’s authority is respected and upheld.
Jordan’s push for these hearings reflects a broader conservative concern about judicial activism. Many Republicans feel that judges are overstepping their bounds and interfering with the executive branch. The upcoming hearings are expected to delve into these issues in detail.
The Judiciary Committee’s efforts are part of a larger Republican strategy to rein in what they see as excessive judicial power. This strategy includes both legislative efforts and financial oversight measures. Jordan is committed to seeing these initiatives through.
He is hopeful that these hearings will shed light on judicial practices that he believes need reform. By addressing these issues, Jordan aims to protect the President’s constitutional powers. He is confident that these hearings will lead to meaningful changes.
The upcoming hearings are anticipated to be a significant event in the ongoing debate over judicial authority. Jordan’s focus on Judge Boasberg highlights the specific cases that have raised Republican concerns. These hearings will likely draw considerable attention from both sides of the political aisle.
Jordan’s efforts are supported by many within the conservative movement who share his concerns. They argue that judicial overreach threatens the balance of power in the U.S. government. The hearings are seen as a crucial step in addressing these concerns.
As the hearings approach, Jordan remains focused on their potential impact. He believes they will provide a platform to address judicial actions that challenge executive authority. Jordan is determined to ensure the hearings lead to concrete outcomes.
The hearings are set to begin soon, and Jordan is prepared to lead the charge. He is committed to examining the actions of federal judges and their implications for the executive branch. Jordan is hopeful that the hearings will prompt necessary reforms.
With the backing of his Republican colleagues, Jordan is optimistic about the hearings’ success. He believes they will highlight the need for legislative and financial reforms. Jordan is confident that these efforts will strengthen the executive branch’s authority.
The Judiciary Committee’s upcoming hearings mark a significant moment in the ongoing debate over judicial power. Jordan is ready to address what he sees as judicial overreach and its impact on President Trump’s administration. He is determined to ensure that the President’s constitutional authority is upheld.
These corrupt judges need to be hit hard financially for obstruction of federal EOs from a sitting president
These corrupt judges think they have more power than a sitting president does. They need to be put in their place and fined personally out of their pocket. They also need to removed from the bench permanently for their outrageous personal attacks against president Trump. Federal obstruction is a criminal felony charge which demands prison time. This needs to be a top priority to prosecute these rogue judges immediately. They also need to be investigated who is sponsoring or kick backing funds to these judges.